Tommee Tippee tackles smell with their new 360º Sealer Diaper Disposal System!

*My Baby Reviewer Diane test drives the Tommee Tippee 360 Sealer Diaper Disposal System*


You know when you walk into a room and the smell hits you in the face… nothing like the strong scent of ammonia to get your day going! And lets be honest, the #2’s are no walk in the park either. With two still in diapers (and one still in pull-ups over night), the Tommee Tippee 360º Sealer Diaper Disposal System would be WELL tested.     

Tommee Tippee 360 Sealer Diaper Disposal System

It was super simple to set up. It comes already put together, you just need to put in the film refills – which are antimicrobial and help to control bacterial odor. The film was a bit awkward to start off, felt like one extra hand would have made it a bit smoother. But the second one I did was a bit easier, there is a bit of knack to it. Putting it in the pail is simple and easy. Took me all of 3-5 minutes to set the whole thing up – and that includes reading the instructions!

Handling the Smell – I was actually surprised at how well it worked. There was ZERO smell. We keep this pail in our bedroom (by the baby’s change table). I used to put dirty diapers or heavy wet diapers straight out to the garage because they were too smelly to keep in the house. Now I just put them right in the #360º Sealer, and we have had no smell issues at all. Nothing short of AMAZING.

Using the 360º Sealer is easy. Lift the lid, drop it in, and twist the dial. That’s it. When you twist the dial, it pulls the film and diaper through the sealer, sealing the diaper all the way around. But be careful, if you’re using it for bigger diapers/pull-ups then you’ll have to push the diaper through a bit. If the diaper doesn’t get pulled all the way through, then the dial gets stuck. It’s easy to fix, but can be a bit of a pain when you have to push each diaper through. The smaller diapers get pulled through without any problems. Just drop them in and twist the dial.

Tommee Tippee 360 Sealer Diaper Disposal System

Emptying the pail (which can hold quite a lot) is easy as well. I like that it has a handle, so I can just pour the “diaper sausage” (as I call it) right into the garbage and I don’t have to haul it out by hand.

The elimination of dirty diaper stench from our bedroom makes the 360º Sealer a star in my books!

Tommee Tippee 360 Sealer Diaper Disposal System

Diane Bio

 

The products mentioned above were provided free of charge. Regardless, I was not obligated to feature this item and all opinions expressed belong to Mom vs. the Boys and are not influenced in any way.

Comments

  1. My 2 are definitely enough for me, lol!

  2. Rose Holloway says

    I had 5…that’s enough 🙂

  3. roger simmons says

    I wanted about 5 or 6. I have 3.

  4. 2 might be nice but I’m very happy with the 1

  5. I have 2. If cost wasn’t an issue, I would consider having one more.

  6. I have 2 and that was enough – more money couldn’t have gotten me through another pregnancy!

  7. I think 4 that way we could have a big house and plenty of things for them to do (and money to travel)!

  8. I think maybe four.

  9. I’d stop at one, so nothing would change!

  10. No. I am happy with the one I have. He’s all I need!!

  11. nicole krutz says

    I have 3 boys, I would have liked a girl but 3 boys is plenty for me 🙂

  12. Judy C (Cowan) says

    I would love 3

  13. Four would be a nice number I think

  14. I would love to have 4, I currently have 2.

  15. Dayna Wilson says

    We plan to have 3, and that sounds like a good number for me. 2 down, one to go 🙂

  16. Probably 4-6.

  17. Jacqueline Sampson says

    its not that cost is an “issue” for me….but I would LOVE to have been able to have at least 6 children 🙂 But I’m so blessed to have the one I do have 🙂

  18. Maegan Morin says

    Not gonne lie I have two kids right now, a boy and a girl, and thats all that I want. Im really happy the way we are.

  19. danielle t says

    3 is the number I like. I have one of each and another girl on the way. couldn’t be happier and we’re stopping there.

  20. if money wasn’t an issue I would want to have at least 4-6 kids

  21. If cost were no issue – I’d have 1 more. I’d also have to have another husband as I’m now divorced but I have always wanted 3.

    M

  22. Well 3 is more than I had originally planned so I am sticking with that.

  23. I think 4

  24. Chandra Christine O'Connor says

    probably 5

  25. Darlene Schuller says

    I had 5. If cost wasn’t an issue I’d had maybe 1-2 more.

  26. I have 3, but want 6-7 🙂

  27. 4. I have always wanted 4, but I’m preparing for our 3rd child to be our last.

  28. 2 is enough

  29. Shannon Baas says

    3 is enough.

  30. I would have 4.

  31. I would love 1 more, I have one son and would love to add one more to our family

  32. Hmmmm 3 has always been my dream #. We currently have two wonderful boys and I am not sure hubby and I could handle the stress of another pregnancy but there seems like something is missing…..

  33. I have 3 and that is enough for me 🙂

  34. I always wanted 6.

  35. two would be enough hehe

  36. would love 2

  37. melikegarfield says

    I would like two.

  38. Cost is not an issue, my insanity is! lol I have 3 boys and that is more then enough for me!!

  39. I think 3 would be good!

  40. kim burnett says

    I have 2

  41. I would have 5

  42. I’d have kids as long as I could. I love cuddling with babies

  43. cheryl hodgkins says

    I have 2 girls and a boy, dont think I would have had anymore even if cost wasn’t an issue. Now I get to enjoy my grandkids and great grandkids.

  44. Maybe 2

  45. I would want 4 and we are planning to have 4.

  46. Angela Mitchell says

    Well I have 2 and that’s enough!

  47. Pauline Milner says

    We have two children, which I think is the perfect number for me. Thanks for the super giveaway opportunity. Keep up the terrific blogging.

  48. If cost were not as issue, I’d like to have 5 children

  49. I think we would stick with 2.

  50. As long as I have a boy and a girl

  51. 4

  52. If cost wasn’t an issue, I would love to have3 or 4 children. Right now, I have 1 year old son and 3 and half year old son.

  53. 3!

  54. If no cost (since then I could stay at home), then probably 3 or 4

  55. I’d like 3

  56. Wanda Bergman says

    Six is what I would have!

  57. I’d like to have 3.

  58. Monique Rizzo says

    3 children.
    Thanks for the chance.

    mogrill12@gmail.com

  59. maegan delorme says

    I’d have 7! lol

  60. natasha severson says

    i’d have 4

  61. 4! But we might ‘settle’ for the wonderful 2 we have

  62. Always wanted 3 and that’s what I have.

  63. colleen fowler says

    I just want two…but i am pregnant with my first, so maybe that number will change!

  64. not sure! maybe 5 or 6?

  65. 4 children is what I would love to have.

  66. Natalie yeoman says

    I’d have 3 (:

  67. Jennifer P. says

    I would love to have three, but we are done at 2.

  68. Sadly, we can’t have children. I’d love to win this for my sister-in-law.

  69. four would be good

  70. i said 2 a girl and boy lol but i had 6 beautiful babies and i wouldnt ever change a thing they are my life 🙂

  71. Lilyana Cruz says

    I have four beautiful children, I think any more 🙂

  72. Sarah Stickney says

    i’d like two

  73. I always wanted 3 or 4.

  74. The amount that God blesses us with! Right now, I feel like two is plenty…but you never know! 🙂

  75. @newfiechick says

    I would have 8 kids if I could afford it. I come from a big family 🙂

  76. kristen visser says

    i have one now but would love a second one. no more then that tho, two would be enough for me 🙂

  77. I have done my share of having children, I have three boys & a daughter. All are grown and moved away now.

  78. christine jessamine says

    I would love to have a total of 3

  79. I had three and we were out numbered LOL

  80. I would have 4!

  81. I would enjoy a family with 3 kids. Thanks.

  82. i dont know, i am pregnant with my first, so i could tell you after i have this one!

  83. ten

  84. If cost and health weren’t an issue, I’d want 3 or 4 I think. I grew up as 1 of 4 and I love having so many siblings.

  85. Two would the ideal number for our us.

  86. Julie Bolduc says

    I would love 7 but we stopped at two its all good

  87. James Brown says

    2 or 3

  88. the three i have now is lots of fun loving work
    good luck too all

  89. If cost wasn’t an issue, I would love to have three or four children.

  90. I would have 3 or 4

  91. I have seven, so maybe a dozen 🙂

  92. Katy Emanuel says

    Probably 3

  93. I have 2 and want 3. We are keeping the option open 🙂

  94. Julia Cosgrove says

    I would probably have about 8 kids if I could.

  95. I’m expecting #3… and cost isn’t an issue. I don’t plan on anymore though.

  96. i would love to have four

  97. if cost were not an issue i would want 6 childrenn

  98. tina reynolds says

    I would have 7 if money or health was not a issue

  99. Two still!

  100. Stephanie Larison says

    We’re trying for more. Money isn’t the issue, it’s my infertility problems. :\

  101. 3 would be a great number.

  102. Tiffany Dustin says

    If cost wasn’t an issue, I’d have at least 10 children 🙂 I love my boys and would love to spread the love even more!

  103. i have 4 that’s more than enough…lol

  104. Carey Miller says

    The same number I have now… zero. But I enjoy other peoples’ children and would love this for one of my best friends who’s pregnant with her first child.

  105. Brittney House says

    I would say one.

  106. I would have 4 or 5.

  107. I think 4 would be perfect for us!

  108. Danielle Wood says

    I wouldn’t want more than 2

  109. Well, I already have four boys, so I guess I’ll say four! Although my husband and I have jokingly (?) discussed trying for a girl one more time!

  110. Leslie Davis says

    1 or 2

  111. I would have 2

join the conversation

*

Mom vs The Boys© 2018

Terms of Use | Disclosure | Contact Me

Do not copy in any form without permission. Copyright protected.